Set Tunes 2017

THE PIOBAIREACHD SOCIETY SET TUNES FOR 2017

The Piobaireachd Society recommends the following lists of tunes for competitions in 2017:

PSC = Piobaireachd Society Collection (Books 1-16)
PS = Piobaireachd Society Catalogue No. (alternative settings pre-1850, Gaelic pronunciation, etc.)
K = Kilberry Book of Ceol Mor
DM = Donald MacLeod
M = Jimmy Macintosh Ceol Mor
B = Binneas is Boreag
Tune Page = Index of Tunes (with links to audio files)

A. SENIOR COMPETITIONS

In Praise of Morag PSC 1, K, PS 83, B, Tune Page
The Prince’s Salute PSC 1, K, PS 173, M, B, Tune Page
The Unjust Incarceration PSC 2, K, PS 3, M, B, Tune Page
Colin Roy MacKenzie’s Lament PSC 3, K, PS 247, B, Tune Page
Craigellachie PSC 6, K, PS 52, M, B, Tune Page
Ronald MacDonald of Morar’s Lament PSC 8, K, PS 176, M, B, Tune Page
My Dearest on Earth give me Your Kiss PSC 11, Tune Page
Rory MacLoude’s Lament PSC 11, PS 64, Tune Page

Competitors will submit four of the above tunes, one of which they will be required to play.

B. GOLD MEDAL COMPETITIONS

Nameless: ‘Hiharin dro o dro’ PSC 4, K, PS 317, M, Tune Page
The Park Piobaireachd No 2 PSC 4, K, PS 21, M, Tune Page
The King’s Taxes PSC 5, K, PS 282, M, B, Tune Page
The MacDougalls’ Gathering PSC 5, K, PS 198, M, B, Tune Page
Beloved Scotland PSC 6, K, PS 187, M, B, Tune Page
The Vaunting PSC 7, K, PS 235, M, B, Tune Page
Lady MacDonald’s Lament PSC 8, K, PS 194, M, Tune Page
Lord Lovat’s Lament PSC 9, K, PS 261, M, Tune Page

Competitors will submit four of the above tunes, one of which they will be required to play.

C. SILVER MEDAL COMPETITIONS

Group 1 Tunes from PS Book 16, published in 2015

Hail to My Country PSC 16, Tune Page
Lord Berisdale’s Salute PSC 16, Tune Page
The Sword’s Lament PSC 16, Tune Page
Rev. Dr Norman MacLeod’s Lament PSC 16, Tune Page

Group 2 Tunes composed by Pipe Major Donald MacLeod

Cronan Phadruig Seumas DM Book 3
Lament for John Morrison of Assynt House PS 20th Cent. Ceol Mor
Lament for The Iolaire DM Piobaireachd Collection
Roderick MacDonald’s Salute DM Piobaireachd Collection

Competitors will submit two tunes from each group, one of which they will be required to play.

Competitors are not restricted to settings specified above. Those who wish to play alternative settings should submit legible scores, indicating the origins of the settings, to competition organisers along with their tune selections.

A wide range of source materials and alternative settings is available on the Piobaireachd Society website at: www.piobaireachd.co.uk and on other piping websites.

Altogether different tunes known by the same or similar names will not be accepted as alternatives.

This announcement is without prejudice to any arrangements made by the Argyllshire Gathering or the Northern Meeting.

For the Music Committee
Alan Forbes, Honorary Secretary
24 Garscube Terrace, Edinburgh, EH12 6BN

1995 John MacFadyen Lecture - Allan MacDonald

Held in the Great Hall of Stirling Castle, five years after winning his two Clasps (1989 and 1990).

The lecture follows on the heels of his University of Edinburgh thesis, The Relationship between Pibroch and Gaelic Song: its Implications on the Performance Style of the Pibroch Urlar. It includes performances by Anne Lorne Gillies, Allan MacColl and Gordon Duncan.

Part One:

Part Two:

In the booklet for Allan’s CD, Dastirum (2007), Bill Livingstone wrote:

Several years ago, my wife Lily and I were driving to the Highland Games at Fort Erie, in Ontario, Canada. The road takes one through the heart of Niagara wine country, so we had planned to find a shady spot in some vineyard for a picnic lunch. But it began to rain. Then to pour. We did park in the middle of a vineyard, but we had to enjoy our picnic and the chardonnay in the car.

A friend had given me tapes of Allan, interviewed on Radio Scotland by Iain MacInnes. It was a wonderful, near-mystical experience. The rain pounded the roof, the car closed in with the heat and steam, and Allan took us on a journey… playing, singing and talking. He told us about the ancient keening tradition, and the original, functional nature of much of pibroch music. He sang the Gaelic songs which underlie the melodies of so many tunes, and laid out his intuition about the complex rhythms which were surely imported into our music from the Gaelic language.

I was pinned to the seat. I heard things that I had never imagined before. Lily, who has been listening to this music for 35 years, but in our modern performance style only, was equally enchanted. It was an exquisite and romantic moment. But from a more mundane point of view, it was a musical epiphany.

Allan has shown, to me at least, that the old manuscripts, and Gaelic language and song, hold the key to a beautiful way of performing this music. I recently shared a stage with him where I demonstrated the modern performance style, and Allan then took us back in time, suggesting how the same tune might have been played 300 years ago. I found the difference exhilarating, of greatest interest. So too did the non pibroch-playing audience.

Some people are strongly attached to the modern tradition, and find Allan’s revolutionary approach unsettling. But no one can doubt that we are listening to a consummate musician, playing with passion and mastery of his art. His integrity and intelligence in a hostile field is something to be treasured.

Breaking the Glass Ceiling

Jointly written by David Hester & Barnaby Brown

For professional Highland bagpipers, the highest recognized achievement is currently attained in the competition environment. This fact often passes by unnoticed and unchallenged.

While this is not unique (after all, it is the same with athletes), it is a bit odd for musicians. Generally, competition success for musical artists is a stepping stone to paid work - engagements, commissions, recording projects, broadcasts - and these things are more highly valued than winning the competition.

Winners of the International Tchaikovsky Competition go on to touring and recording opportunities and the Avery Fischer career grants and prizes provide a major boost for instrumentalists who make performance their livelihood. Even X-factor winners are not expected to compete once they have won, but are provided opportunities to develop singing careers.

Not so with piping careers. There is no similar expectation. Although many top competitive pipers give recitals, instruct and record, there is no expectation for them to do so. Our competitions either lead to more competitions or are ends in and of themselves.

That wasn’t always the case. After a long pre-history with tales of competitions and fairy assistance, or pipers refusing to compete with MacCrimmon out of respect, the modern-era competitions began in 1781 with a rule that previous winners were barred. As in silver and gold medal competitions today, the top prize carried the winer to the next stage. In the 1780s, piping competitions were fundamentally motivated by a demand for pipers in the British Army, one that outstripped supply. On top of this, the competitions became showcase events for pipers to obtain professional positions with the landed gentry. But note, elite pipers post-1746 were low-caste servants. They were no longer the high-caste gentlemen they had been in the 1600s, people of a social standing that we would associate today with a university degree and a secure, full-time career path.

Fortunately, these things are changing. The Alt Pibroch Club would therefore like to initiate (or join in on) serious conversations contemplating what lies beyond winning the Clasp at Inverness or the Senior Piobaireachd at Oban. How can we move in small increments towards a scenario where a professional career as a big-game musician is the ultimate prize? Towards a career that allows you to pay the mortgage and support a family, i.e. ‘professional’ in the mainstream sense, rather than the piping sense (which in a good year might bring in $8,000 if you are lucky).

This vision - that competition winners can look forward to musical careers beyond the competition environment - is perhaps intimately connected with the overall aim of the Alt Pibroch Club. Currently, this is expressed on our About page as:

to expand contemporary pibroch interpretation

We have identified three goals in delivering that mission, the first of which is:

  1. To provide a safe space which nurtures experimentation and the confidence to play (and to reward) alternative settings and styles, encouraging pluralism in mainstream pibroch performance.

The question is, which is the dog and which is the tail - pluralism of interpretation, or commanding a wider audience? Or are these complementary aspects of the same thing, yin and yang?

We at the Alt Pibroch Club are contemplating an expansion of the mission and goals stated on our About page by considering the ways in which we may help develop career paths that currently lie beyond pibroch players’ horizons.

This would mean focusing on audience building - possibly learning a thing or two from what symphony orchestras and opera houses do in order to build their audiences and attract funding and patronage in contemporary society.

The Alt Pibroch Club is ready to forge partnerships that can make a difference. This is as much about transforming mindsets outside piping as within piping and can’t happen overnight. Things have been moving steadily in promising directions, however, and we believe the momentum exists now to do something exciting to every piper’s benefit. This is not about changing the game. Rather, it is about removing the glass ceiling that currently prevents pibroch players from climbing higher, commanding an international career like any other musician.

Here are some ideas to get the conversations started:

  1. We propose the formation of a steering group composed of experienced pipers and piping event organisers, experienced booking agents and promoters, prestigious venues, broadcasters and a recording label, in order to attract a consortium of patrons and sponsors who are excited by this idea.
  2. We propose a fact-finding mission that will observe and reflect on what can be learned from big-time international competitions outside piping.
  3. We propose consideration of the development of positive incentives or explicit assessment criteria to reward pipers who engage the audience and go the extra mile, rising above safe, stereotypical interpretations and repertoire. This development need not take place within the competition environment, but instead can take place within a complementary series of showcases for professional and amateur performers.
  4. We propose the above-mentioned series include the public performances also include Gaelic harp, fiddle and vocal music (with supertitle translations), perhaps also traditional story-telling, in order to re-integrate piping with its rich and fascinating cultural heritage and perhaps in the process make it more digestible for the young and the uninitiated.
  5. We propose exploring and understanding the requirements to host such performances at major international venues - New York, Vancouver, Sydney, Tokyo, Berlin, Paris and London.
  6. We propose determining which of the legal structures out there - existing or to-be-created - would be best suited to turn this dream into reality.
  7. Finally, we propose to partner with major pipe band associations and piobaireachd societies to help develop channels of professional development, including but not limited to, the recital series mentioned, in order to help elite performers break through the glass ceiling and develop rich and rewarding professional opportunities.

This is our blue-sky thinking. It is not something that can be contemplated alone! But we’re ready to be part of a bigger process and believe it is attainable and sustainable.

We wish to solicit your feedback and support.